Pfizer Makes Desperate Attempt to Blame Trump for Their Crimes in Court Case
Pfizer's attorney made a desperate attempt in court to throw the FDA under the bus for committing Pfizer's fraud and then he tried to blame Trump for the fraud committed by Pfizer and the FDA
Updated March 18, 2023: It’s common knowledge that the mainstream ‘fake news’ media, career criminal politicians, and power-hungry liberal-leaning corporations consistently attempt to blame former President Trump for their failures and crimes. It’s called projecting or gaslighting.
It should be of no surprise that Pfizer is no different than their deep state criminal co-conspirators. In a desperate attempt to not be held criminally liable for developing an unsafe, ineffective and harmful biological agent for use on American adults and children, the Pharma giant tried to blame former President Trump.
Before I get to Pfizer’s desperate attempt to blame Trump for the crimes Pfizer committed in the $3 trillion case against them, let’s get some background information on the court case.
Who is Brook Jackson and Why is Pfizer Terrified of Her?
Brook Jackson is an experienced director of FDA clinical trials who reported dozens of the FDA violations she personally observed while working at Ventavia. Ventavia was one of the clinical trial research organizations contracted by Pfizer to conduct their Phase-3 mRNA vaccine trials.
Ventavia ignored Brook’s reports of the clinical trial violations, so Brook called the FDA directly (a very brave and bold move). Ventavia fired Brook later that same day (shocker).
Brook was then later contacted by a Pfizer attorney, who mysteriously had her personal cell phone number that her former employee did not even have, in hopes of making her go away.
After reading Pfizer’s March 3, 2023, transcript from their motion to dismiss hearing, I can tell you this brave American hero isn’t going away any time soon.
The Honorable Michael Truncale Affirms that Contracts, Facts, and Law are What Matter in Court, Not Subjective Interpretations or Opinions
Under Pfizer’s contract with the US military, Pfizer guaranteed to deliver a safe and effective vaccine in order to get paid.
The vaccine could not be a ‘may be effective vaccine’ or ‘may be safe vaccine’ but must be guaranteed to be safe and effect per their Operation Warp Speed contract.
The Kingston Report is reader-supported. Consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
While EUA (emergency use authorization) laws passed under presidential administrations such as Bush, Jr. and Obama, essentially granted big pharma iron-clad immunity from liability if they manufactured ineffective and unsafe products and then made them available to the American people, Pfizer forfeited this immunity with their safe and effective vaccine guarantee. The safe and effective vaccine guarantee was made more than a dozen times throughout the contract via citations of specific FDA laws and that their vaccines would be safe and effective per conducting standard clinical trials for FDA approved vaccines.
It’s important to note that Phase-3 clinical trials are regulated by laws separate from EUA laws. Pfizer’s attorney tried to persuade Judge Weese that under EUA laws and allegedly under the contract, it is the judge’s responsibility to relieve herself of the case and move it a 3-judge panel (per the law and contract).
Judge Truncale points out to Pfizer’s attorney that the EUA contract clause to move the case to arbitration is precluded by the word ‘may’ and that the word ‘may’ does not mean the same thing as ‘shall.’
Funny how criminals constantly try and change the meaning of words in attempts to get away with their crimes.
Plus Brook Jackson was working on a Phase-3 clinical trial for an FDA-approved product, not an EUA product. (Major, minor detail)
Judge Affirms Legal Argument that Pfizer has Immunity under US Government Contract to Commit FDA Fraud is the Dumbest Thing He Has Ever Heard
Sasha Latypova literally went on a speaking tour claiming that there was a secret agreement for Pfizer to commit fraud as part of their agreement with the US military, and that Pfizer has legal immunity from fraud and all crimes under this secret agreement and the EUA laws.
I appeared on Stew Peters shortly after hearing about this nonsense, asserting that this was the dumbest thing I had ever heard in my 25 plus years of analyst and med-legal experience. I stated that Sasha would have been fired from any legitimate pharma company or contract research organization for making such an absurd and reckless claim that the US government can offer immunity to Pfizer under a contract to commit a crime (fraud).
Sasha’s reckless and imaginary legal defense of Pfizer turned into a PsyOp that was blasted all over the alternative media.
It is my understanding that many anti-COVID-19 vaccine attorneys and mRNA experts actually still believe this nonsense. Well it must be an attorney thing, because Pfizer’s defense attorney apparently also believed in Sasha’s inane claim that the contract protects Pfizer from criminal prosecution.
When Pfizer’s attorney Wessel tried the ‘Sasha Latypova’ strategy in court, Judge Truncale verbally eviscerated Wessel and shut him down.
Judge Truncale agrees with my expert assertion that the legal argument claiming that Pfizer has immunity because they were contracted to commit fraud by the US government is inconceivable.
“It would be inconceivable to have a contract that would say, ‘provided FDA has granted approval based upon fraudulent test data’.” - Judge Michael Truncale
Basically Judge Truncale told Wessel that the legal argument that Pfizer has immunity because the Pharma giant was contracted to commit fraud under an implied (secret) agreement is so stupid that it’s is not even worth him mentally entertaining the idea for a second (aka, it’s inconceivable).
Pfizer would have loved it if Judge Truncale had fallen for Latypova’s imaginary and creative legal strategy on how to protect Pfizer from prosecution, the same way most of the ‘ban the jab’ attorneys and leading influential experts fell for this nonsense.
There’s been other manipulative propaganda promoted by some attorneys and ‘experts’ that Pfizer is secretly part of the US government and military. This propaganda has been part of the successful effort in convincing American citizens that they can not pursue civil or criminal litigation against Pfizer. This completely fictitious story has been blasted on conservative and alternative media platforms.
Judge Explains to Wessel that the US Government is NOT Interested in Participating in Pfizer’s Case
When Wessel approached the bench claiming the the United States of America was the real party of interest in Brook’s Whistle blower case, Judge Truncale assured Wessel that the United States of America is not interested in the case, and that the US government specifically expressed to the judge their refusal to have anything to with Mr. Wessel or his client, Pfizer.
“You noticed I did not mention them when I called the style of the case because they refused to participate in this.” - Judge Michael Truncale
If You Read the Contract, Like Brook Jackson’s Attorney Did, You Can Lay Down the Law and Shatter Pfizer’s Imaginary Immunity
I wrote about Pfizer’s criminal conduct and complete lack of legal immunity on January 13, 2023, in 10 Reasons to Criminally Charge Pfizer Now and how to completely destroy the Pharma giant in court, which is exactly what attorney Robert Barnes did on March 1, 2023.
Attorney Robert Barnes brilliantly cites the Pfizer contract clauses for delivering safe and effective vaccines in his legal arguments to not dismiss his client’s case.
Verbiage articulating the safe and effective requirement was also required on all of Pfizer’s invoices that were submitted to the US government for payment.
The Operation Warp Speed contract and invoices strongly emphasized that the Pfizer was to deliver a safe and effective vaccine, not under EUA standards, but per clinical trials for an FDA-approved product. Pfizer was NOT going to get paid one cent if their mRNA vaccine was not considered by the FDA to be as safe and as effective as any FDA-approved product.
Barnes even clearly articulated that while Pfizer was contracted to deliver a safe and effective vaccine, the pharma criminal, in fact, delivered a biological agent that is NOT a vaccine and is harmful (not safe).
Barnes all but said, Pfizer developed and delivered a bioweapon instead of a vaccine.
Per 18 USC 175, a biological agent, toxin and/or delivery device (i.e. mRNA vaccine technology) that was developed and deployed under fraudulent human research, does not prevent infection, does not protect against disease and causes harm, is in fact, a bioweapon.
Pfizer Throws FDA Under the Bus and Attempts to Blame Trump
It appears that when Pfizer’s attorney had the revelation that the judge was not buying his nonsensical legal strategy that Pfizer had legal immunity to commit crimes per the US military contract, Wessel made a desperate attempt to throw the FDA under the bus. He blamed the FDA for committing fraud after being informed by Brook Jackson of Pfizer’s fraud. He blamed the FDA for Brook’s firing from Ventavia. And then Wessel tried to blame former President Trump for all of the fraud, by stating;
“Pfizer had nothing to do with her firing. She told the FDA and, again, it’s the Trump FDA.” - Carlton Wessel, Pfizer’s Attorney (NOT a US Government Attorney), DLA Piper
“It’s the Trump FDA!” “It’s the Trump FDA?!”
This is now the 2nd dumbest thing I have heard in my 25 plus years of experience in the industry. Many of the members of the FDA, and specifically those that work on vaccines and biologics (CBER - Center for Biologics and Evaluation and Research), had been with the FDA for at least a decade, prior to President Trump taking office.
Here are some of the key FDA employees who are directly responsible for authorizing the use of mRNA bioweapon technology on the American children and the year they joined the FDA.
Janet Woodcock, Former FDA Commissioner, 1986, Reagan
Peter Marks, Director CBER, 2012, Obama
Marion Gruber, Former Director CBER, 1992, George Bush Sr.
Ramachandra Naik, Chair, 2014, Obama
CAPT Michael Smith, Administrative Specialist, 2014, Obama
Lucia Lee, Clinical Reviewer, (her name is on BLA’s back to 2015), Obama
Lei Huang, Mathematical Statistician, 2015, Obama
Haruhiko Murata, Vaccine Sr. Manager, 2007, George Bush Jr.
Xiao Wang, Fellow, 2013, Obama
Narayan Nair, Director Pharmacovigilance, 2019, Trump
Brenda Baldwin, 2006, George Bush Jr.
Bhanumathi Kannan, 2004, George Bush Jr.
Oluchi Elekwachi, 2012, Obama
Out of the 13 members of the FDA who played an integral role in authorizing Pfizer’s mRNA bioweapons for children, one (1) joined the FDA during the Trump administration. This looks much more like an “Obama/Bush Legacy FDA” than a ‘Trump FDA.’
Liars Lie and Manipulate the Inexperienced
Pfizer has been the largest criminal drug cartel in the world for decades. Now with mRNA technology, Pfizer has now gotten themselves into the international bioweapons market as well.
If those who purport that Pfizer has legal immunity are truly experts, then they are intentionally lying to manipulate their followers and to manipulate ‘experts’ who have large followings, but have little to no knowledge of FDA laws or med-legal analysis experience.
Being an Expert Comes with Experience
With more than 25 years of biotech analyst and med-legal experience, I have the expertise to prepare prosecutors to win against Pfizer in a court of law, civil or criminal.
The judge in Brook Jackson’s case asserts several times that he agrees with a med-legal analysis of the contracts and US law that closely resembles my med-legal analysis. My med-legal analysis that Pfizer does not have immunity.
Lieutenant General Krillilov, the Russian Military Chief of Nuclear and Biowarfare, cites my med-legal analysis in his most recent global briefing on Pfizer’s role in the use of mRNA technology bioweapons on civilians under the guise of ‘safe and effective vaccines’ and has launch a global criminal prosecution of Pfizer. Lieutenant General Krillilov cites my work and affirms that the mRNA vaccines are by definition agents of biowarfare, per 18 USC 175.
Why Do We Follow ‘Experts’ Who Defend Corporate Criminals?
Despite all the evidence I have presented in my SubStack and on Stew Peters, the majority of our movement continues to dig their heals in and assert that Pfizer has immunity from civil and criminal prosecution.
Despite the facts that a nearly verbatim legal argument of my analysis of Pfizer’s contracts is being used to prevail against Pfizer in a $3 trillion court case, and that the Russian Chief of Nuclear and Biowarfare cites my med-legal analysis in a literal global military war room, so many on our side are being manipulated by their favorite trusted experts into believing Pfizer is untouchable.
Anyone Can Be Manipulated and Deceived by Experts They Trusts
As of today, some of the top experts in our movement who are calling to ‘ban the shots’ are not calling the mRNA technology bioweapons, but rather gene-editing therapies or gain-of-function viruses. Many of these experts have also convincingly persuaded nearly all the leaders in our government and movement that Pfizer is immune from liability and that it is not possible to show criminal intent.
We’ve all been manipulated and deceived by some advisors and leaders we trust. If you believed Pfizer had immunity due to EUA laws or under their military contract, or that the mRNA technology was developed for actual therapeutic uses, and not exclusively for use as transhumanistic gene-editing bioweapons, I hope this SubStack can put into perspective how it could be so difficult for President Trump to accept the fact that he was manipulated and deceived by experts he trusted into believing the Operation Warp Speed team deployed safe and effective vaccines.
Ignoring Pfizer’s War Crimes is Not in the Best Interest of America
Ignoring crimes of biowarfare or making excuses as to why we can not prosecute Pfizer is not going to make these crimes go away. It makes the United States complicit in global biowarfare. Global military powers have been forced to take measures to stop America’s biowarfare programs, including all mRNA technologies and NIH/DTRA vaccine programs because we are refusing to stop the destruction of American civilians ourselves.
If you want America to take control of this biowarfare nightmare, please reach out to government leaders and powerful media influencers to request for me to present the evidence that can take down Pfizer and stop the mRNA technology platform dead in its tracks. I can be reach through miFight.com
Be wise. Be well. And never fear the truth.
The Kingston Report. TRUTH WINS.
Do not be envious of evil men, nor desire to be with them;
For their heart devises violence, and their lips talk of troublemaking.
Through wisdom a house is built, and by understanding it is established;
By knowledge the rooms are filled, with all precious and pleasant riches.
A wise man is strong. Yes, a man of knowledge increases strength; by wise counsel you will wage your own war and in a multitude of counselors there is safety.
The Goodness Inside
People often ask me for advice on supplements and medical treatments. I can’t make medical recommendations for you, but for me, I know that reducing the level of acid in your body and taking a supplement that contains zeolite can help remove toxic metals from your body.
I use TouchStone Essentials Zeolite daily.
Trump opened the door for Americans to take back their country legally. ALL of America owes Karen Kingsten recognition and gratitude for doing her important part with her skills when God and history chose her to stand up. I can't say how grateful I am.
Thank you, Karen