In my recent interview with Stew Peters, I review the confidential Pfizer research and development trade secret document for the invention of Pfizer’s mRNA spike proteins.
Is the shot transmissible through kissing and sex?
Tremendous thanks. This leads to the WHO, WEF & United Nations. The 5G 15 minute gulag has a nasty sting. Share this everywhere to non trouble makers, then it will seep out uncontrollably.
More than sufficient proof has been submitted to shut them down now, forever!
So, I think I should first admit my lack of knowledge in this field. Cryo-electron microscopy is not a specialty of mine.
And possibly due to that, I have a small limitation with what you're claiming here.
But before I get into that, I believe (as you mention) that others have shown that there's graphene oxide in the shots.
Okay, so the limitation I have is this: I believe this finding only shows that graphene oxide was used in the preparation of the P2 S.
Yes, in the interview, you were adamant that this shows that there's graphene in the shots, and while it's possible that some graphene could adhere to the purified protein sample, I'm not sure if significant amounts of it would.
(Of course, "significant" is a relative term. These shots are being injected into people, so even if an "insignificant" amount of graphene adhered to the protein, I suppose it could be cause for concern.)
I did look up that document you mentioned: A New Support Film for Cryo Electron Microscopy Protein Structure Analysis Based on Covalently Functionalized Graphene.
In the abstract, it says, "The application of the modified TEM grids in single particle analysis (SPA) shows high protein binding to the surface of the graphene-based support film."
So, my question is: is it the protein that binds to the graphene, or is it the graphene that binds to the protein? (I suppose it could also be both.)
I suspect that there is graphene oxide in (at least some of) the bioweapon vials, but I wonder if it was added via another route, rather than at the Cryo-EM stage.
But, then again...I could be totally wrong.
Having the proof.....smoking gun proof is necessary. This seems pretty tight. Bioweapon assertion is bolstered. Immunity shot to hell. Now we need a sheriff to do his thing! Victims are a plenty, sadly.
The aim is to use that nanotechnology in future "vaccine" development and human tracking; they are deliberately obfuscating about wanting the "vaccines" removed because too many facts are being revealed and it is now politically correct to try to do or say whatever it takes to cover their backsides.
Thank You Karen. You are in my prayers.
There is an active movement of the controlled opposition completely in denial about this and the whole 5g theme and some of them, like George Webb, cuts off every question about this in twitters
spaces and he knows the nicknames of the core perpetrators ... Malone and Webb both blocked me when I sent detailed electron microscopy& spectroscopy- especially single walled carbon nanotubes and biosynthetic ribbons at 12000x seem to bother a lot of folks. I posted this a few seconds after Musks veritas post on twitter and got like 20k views in a few minutes and then they deleted exactly these images and all our conversations about it on the fly ! I think Elon did it himself, since it became one of the top comments with dozens of shares in minutes - the medical freedom movement is getting as indoctrinated as the extreme political movements
I thought we knew along time ago there was graphene oxide in the shots but now you show 100% proof so I hope people pay attention. What pisses me off is Malone knew all along and said nothing while people died and were maimed. I speak to God everyday and I know I have His protection but I pray He can protect others especially the children, that's what really breaks my heart, all the children dying. There were 96 children who died in 3 months from the bioweapon shots, the youngest was only 2 years old.