PFIZER Uses Press Release to Deny Liability Risk in Bizarre Announcement

Under the EUA Laws, it's impossible for a judge to convict PFIZER or any organization of willful misconduct if the judge believes the FDA approval never happened.

On November 18, 2022, PFIZER issued the most bizarre Fortune 500 press release I have read in my professional lifetime. Fortune 500 companies issue press releases to inform investors about forecasted activities or achieved milestones that can impact revenue and therefore the stock price. This press release did neither.

The press release was sent out to allegedly announce the ‘clinical efficacy’, or ‘immune response’ of PFIZER’s now available Omicron Bivalent Boosters. The press release says absolutely nothing about clinical efficacy or health benefits of the bivalent boosters, such as reduced hospitalizations, severe illness, or death.

The press release is written in irrelevant scientific vernacular (mumbo jumbo) that you need a PhD in immunology to understand.

For those who do understand this scientific word-vomit (clearly not intended for the general public or investor community), a scientifically sound takeaway would be that a patient’s antibody responses to PFIZER’s mRNA bivalent booster is so strong it would actually be categorized as harmful and potentially life-threatening.

The scientific term for this potentially lethal response to an mRNA vaccine is immunogenicity.

Immunogenicity is when a protein-based therapies, such as PFIZER’s COVID-19 mRNA vaccines cause a patient’s immune system to attack self; resulting in disease, disability, or even death.

Per a June 23, 2020 article by FDA employee, Zuben E. Sauna, PhD, of the Center for Biologics and Evaluations Research (CBER) projects;

“A major problem with protein-based therapeutics is their immunogenicity, that is, their tendency to trigger an unwanted immune response against themselves…Such antibodies can also cause complications that can be life-threatening.” - Dr. Zuben Sauna, FDA, CBER

The definition of immunogenicity is eloquently expressed in the mission statement of BioNTech, PFIZER’s mRNA vaccine partner. The mRNA vaccines ‘harnessing the immune system’s full potential to fight human disease.’

PFIZER’s mRNA vaccines are used to fight the disease of humans. In other words, to harm, injure, or kill humans. Case in point, PFIZER’s Omicron bivalent boosters are NOT proven to prevent infection, severe illness, hospitalization or death. PFIZER’s boosters ARE proven to cause harm and injury. Per a recent study, 85% of healthcare employees suffered a harmful reaction and 1 out of 5 employees (20%) were unable to work after receiving PFIZER’s bivalent booster.

So why did PFIZER issue this bizarre press release? Well if you read paragraph six, it would appear that PFIZER used the bivalent booster announcement to assure their investors that:

• PFIZER did NOT receive FDA approval for COMIRNATY,

• PFIZER is NOT the marketer of COMIRNATY, and

• PFIZER still has iron-clad immunity under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).

These claims can easily be proven to be FALSE.

COMIRNATY’s website clearly states that COMIRNATY is FDA-approved and that the FDA-approved indication for COMIRNATY is for immunization against COVID-19 for children and adults 12 years of age and older.

Although PFIZER claims BioNTech is the marketer, you can clearly see by PFIZER’s logo and name plastered all over the COMIRNATY website that PFIZER is a marketer of COMIRNATY. Their November 18, 2022, press release confirms PFIZER and BioNTech are joint partners.

Because BioNTech and PFIZER are joint partners in the United States, this means that they are equally liable for manufacturing, marketing, and distribution.

On August 23, 2021, the FDA approved PFIZER’s COMIRNATY breaking the EUA immunity shield. PFIZER has produced, distributed, and marketed COMIRNATY in the United States and is subject to civil and criminal liability under the Food & Drug Consumer Protection Act, and hundreds of federal and state laws due to the disabilities, disease, and death their mRNA vaccines have caused.

Why are attorneys and experts who are fighting against PFIZER continuing to put their faith in the preferred narrative of Albert Bourla, PFIZER’s CEO, instead of recognizing the overwhelming body of evidence from government databases, contracts, and distribution chains that PFIZER’s FDA-approved mRNA vaccines are available in the US? Will these attorneys and experts believe the testimony of another Big Pharma CEO instead?

AstraZeneca’s CEO, Pascal Soriot, told reporters during a recent press briefing that the company decided to withdraw its emergency use application for their COVID-19 vaccine because PFIZER’s mRNA vaccines have full FDA approval.

“Because the FDA has already fully approved mRNA vaccines from Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna, the agency’s emergency use authorization pathway for other vaccines is closed.” - Pascal Soriot, AstraZeneca CEO, November 10, 2022

Why did PFIZER issue this investor relations press release? PFIZER issued this bizarre press release because they have no choice but to double-down on their lie that the FDA-approval ‘didn’t really happen’. The Pharma Giant’s only legal hope is that attorneys will use Big Pharma’s 3-ring media-circus of sophisticated tricks and expert witnesses to convince judges across America that PFIZER still has immunity.

Don’t believe their lies.

Under the PREP ACT/EUA Laws ALL CRIMES ARE LEGAL for ‘qualified persons’ or ‘covered persons.’ PFIZER is designated as a ‘covered person’ per their contract with the Department of Defense.

‘Qualified persons/covered persons’ can not be convicted of intentional battery, assault, murder, or even fraud (willful misconduct), as long as ‘covered person’ has reason to believe their designation is as such; and ‘covered person’ is following HHS guidance.

If a person suffers a serious injury or death caused by an EUA mRNA vaccine, HHS just needs to be notified of the ‘serious injury or death within seven (7) days of its discovery.’ The notification will ensure ‘covered persons’ continue to have liability protection.

Notification to HHS about mRNA vaccine injuries and death is automated by the FDA’s BEST system.

While PFIZER has 100% iron-clad immunity against any harm caused by their EUA mRNA vaccine, that iron-clad immunity shield is ‘separate and distinct’ from an FDA-approved mRNA vaccine.

The FDA-approved mRNA vaccines are subject to the laws of the Food and Drug Consumer Protection Act and are not protected by the immunity clauses in PFIZER’s contract with the US military.

For victims of PFIZER’s EUA mRNA vaccine harm, the legal battle is much stronger than what we have been led to believe. If an individual received PFIZER’s EUA mRNA vaccine, but that individual had reason to believe they were receiving PFIZER’s FDA-approved mRNA vaccine, the EUA shield is still broken and you have legal power to charge PFIZER with civil and criminal violations.

PFIZER’s EUA immunity shield was shattered when they received FDA approval on August 23, 2021. PFIZER then engaged in the marketing, manufacturing, and interstate distribution of FDA-approved COMIRNATY confirming that their EUA shield was dissolved.

Why is this point so critical in the war for truth and justice? Under EUA law it is impossible for a judge to convict PFIZER or any other ‘covered person’ of any crime related to the EUA mRNA vaccines.

Even if a judge believes that PFIZER engaged in willful misconduct, under EUA law, the judge must ‘punt’ the case to a three-judge panel (arbitration). If the three-judge panel believes that the FDA’s approval of PFIZER’s mRNA vaccines never occurred and/or the approved mRNA vaccines were never marketed, manufactured or distributed, the three-judge panel will be forced to either;

• dismiss all charges against PFIZER, or

• refer the victims to the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP).

There are currently 7,412 claims for alleged injuries/deaths from COVID-19 vaccines filed in the CICP database. None of these claims have been paid.

For readers of The Kingston Report, I want you to be 100% confident in knowing that just because an expert proclaims something on a news outlet; or a company issues a press release, that doesn’t make it true.

Trust evidence. Not the media and not experts who continue to make false proclamations in light of glaring contradictory evidence.

If you or a loved-one is working with an attorney that doesn’t grasp the legal distinction between PFIZER’s immunity before and after FDA-approval, as well as the immunity for other ‘covered persons,’ I strongly encourage you to seek a second opinion.

The Kingston Report. TRUTH WINS.

Ephesians 4

“I urge you to live a life worthy of the calling you have received. Then we will no longer be infants, tossed back and forth by the waves, and blown here and there by every wind of teaching and by the cunning and craftiness of people in their deceitful scheming. Instead, speaking the truth in love, we will grow to become in every respect the mature body of him who is the head, that is, Christ.”