Dear Anonymous Reuters Fact Check Team Member, Regarding Graphene Oxide
“We (Reuters) have contacted SINOPEG,….who told us that (they) have never provided any lipid nanoparticles that include graphene oxide.”
On August 6, 2021, REUTERS accused me of spreading misinformation because of my July 28, 2021 appearance on The Stew Peters Show where I stated that graphene oxide was in COVID-19 ‘vaccines.’ Stew asked me if I was confident in my statement. I responded by saying I was as confident that graphene oxide is in the COVID-19 shots as I am in gravity.
This is the article REUTERS ran on me on August 11, 2021.
The question is….now that more than year has passed, will REUTERS attempt to reverse course and start reporting the truth regarding the existence of graphene oxide in the COIVD-19 shots? Or… will REUTERS continue to be an integral part of the false and deceptive narrative that is destroying America and exterminating humanity?
REUTERS requested a response from me to verify my statements. Below is my response to REUTERS.
From: Karen Kingston <************@mifight.com>
Date: August 8, 2021 at 7:10:57 PM PDT
To: reutersfactcheckthomsonreuters.com@thomsonreuters.com
Cc: Karen Kingston
Subject: Re: Reuters - media inquiry
Dear Anonymous Reuters Fact Check Team Member,
This email is in response to your August 6, 2021 media inquiry alleging to “spot and debunk misinformation on social media,” regarding graphene oxide (GO) in EUA mRNA COVID-19 VACCINES.
Just so we’re all on the same page, the newly spawned term ‘misinformation’ is defined as “the spreading of false or inaccurate information with the intention to deceive.” If you can prove it, feel free to ‘debunk’ the data or documents I have shared, but be very careful with which words you choose in describing things you know nothing of, such as my character or my beliefs. Information is either true, false, inaccurate, or unproven, however written statements about one’s character or intentions are often libel.
In response to the email I received from Reuters Fact Checkers from Aug 6th, Reuters states that, “We (Reuters) have contacted SINOPEG,….who told us that (they) have never provided any lipid nanoparticles that include graphene oxide.”
As Reuters was conducting their investigative research on determining whether graphene oxide (GO) is in the COVID-19 Excipients or Vaccines, did REUTERS ask any of the following questions of your contact(s) at SINOPEG before concluding with 100% confidence that GO is not in the COVID-19 Excipients or Vaccines?
Does SINOPEG have a business relationship or contract with Shanghai National Engineering Research Center for Nanotechnology (SNERCN) CO. Ltd, the Chinese-based company that owns the GO LNP encapsulated mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Patent?
Does SINOPEG have a business relationship or contract with one of SNERCN’s affiliates or parent companies?
Does SINOPEG ship or has SINOPEG ever shipped the “PEGylated LNP COVID-19 Excipients” directly to manufacturers contracted by Pfizer, BioNTech, or Moderna, to produce the COVID-19 Vaccines, such as AGC Biologics?
AGC Biologics has facilities in Tokyo, Japan; Heidelberg, Germany; Boulder, CO, et al.
Does SINOPEG ship or has SINOPEG ever shipped the “PEGylated LNP COVID-19 Excipients” directly to Shanghai National Engineering Research Center for Nanotechnology CO. Ltd?
Does SINOPEG ship the COVID-19 Excipients to a manufacturing facility, such as AGC Biologics, that receives “COVID-19 Vaccine Ingredients” from both SINOPEG and Shanghai National Engineering Research Center for Nanotechnology CO. Ltd or one of SNERCN’s affiliates or parent companies?
REUTERS continues in your e-mail with ‘evidence’ that graphene oxide is not in the vaccines because, “Experts also told us (Reuters) this material is not in the vaccines and that the PEG-lipid nanoparticles are there to give more stability to the mRNA.”
As Reuters continued their investigative reporting on determining whether graphene oxide (GO) is in the COVID-19 Excipients or Vaccines by interviewing ‘experts’ and in compliance with the International Fact Checking Network Code of Principles, did REUTERS ask any of the following questions of the “experts” who told Reuters that GO was 100% ABSOLUTELY NOT in the COVID-19 Excipients or Vaccines?
What are the names of the “experts” who proclaim GO is 100% ABSOLUTELY NOT in the COVID-19 Vaccines?
Are these “experts” affiliated with any of the Global COVID-19 Vaccine manufacturers? Or their investors?
Do the “experts” benefit financially in any way from the manufacturing or sale of the COVID-19 Excipients or Vaccines?
At what lab did the experts run their tests to prove that GO is not in the PEGylated LNPs/COVID-19 Vaccines? What’s the name of the lab? Who owns the lab? Where is it located? What are the names of the researchers who ran the tests?
Other than cholesterol and phospholipids, what specific elements did your ‘experts’ show are in the LNPs?
Are any of the ingredients in the COVID-19 Excipients toxic or lethal to humans? At what levels?
What damage can be done to cells, organs and systems by these ingredients at sublethal levels of injection? What are the microgram or nanogram measurements of the toxic and lethal concentrations of these ingredients?
Stew Peters also had Dr. Jane Ruby on his show who presented data from a lab in Spain that showed high levels of GO in the COVID-19 vaccine vials. What were your ‘experts’ comments on that data? What evidence do the ‘experts’ have to refute the lab findings from Spain?
If the ‘experts’ claim GO is not in the COVID-19 Excipients, what element in the Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA LNP COVID-19 Excipients results in the production of large of amounts of highly-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1b and GM-CSF and upregulation of thousands of genes?
“We further found large amounts of IL-1β, GM-CSF, IL-6, the signature cytokines of inflammatory responses (Figure 2C). Our RNA-seq analysis revealed that thousands of genes were upregulated (Figure 2D) upon LNP injection. With p<0.05 9,508 genes and with FDR<0.05 8,883 genes were differentially expressed.”
Pg. 5 of The mRNA-LNP Platform’s Lipid Nanoparticle Component Used in Preclinical Vaccine Studies is Highly Inflammatory. Ndeupen S, Qin Z, Jacobsen, S, et al. Thomas Jeferson Univ, Dept of Microbiology and Immunology, Philadelphia, PA. March 2021.
Before REUTERS chooses to run an article to attempt to discredit the fact that the EUA COVID-19 Vaccine Ingredients were never fully disclosed to the American public or that the LNPs are irrefutably proven to contain highly toxic substances that are highly-inflammatory and in some cases lethal to humans, REUTERS may want to better understand their liability as a Publisher in the promotion of the EUA COVID-19 Vaccines.
Americans are becoming educated and aware of the Federal Laws specific to the EUA of the COVID-19 Vaccines and the violations that were not only committed by the FDA, CDC, and NIH, but also by communicators of information regarding the EUA COIVD-19 Vaccines such as the media, including REUTERS.
REUTERS is fully aware that the EUA COVID-19 Vaccines are NOT FDA APPROVED. Regardless of this knowledge, REUTERS persistently promotes the ‘alleged benefits’ of the EUA COVID-19 Vaccines and willfully misleads American citizens to believe that they are receiving an FDA approved product when getting vaccinated. This willful misconduct places REUTERS and its employees at risk for liability for the harm and death inflicted upon the American people by the EUA COVID-19 Vaccines.
Make no mistake, with the help of REUTERS, Americans are continually being denied truthful evidence about the EUA COVID-19 vaccines and are being manipulated into participating in a global clinical experiment of first-in-human (FIH) biological gene therapy agents encapsulated in lipid-nanoparticle technology (which REUTERS just confirmed with SINOPEG in writing to me) under the false guise of ‘safe and effective vaccines’ to prevent COVID-19 infection. REUTERS is not only willfully withholding information regarding the ingredients, effectiveness, side effects, and VAERS/RWE deaths of the EUA COVID-19 VACCINES, but REUTERS now appears to be collaborating with organizations in China to cover up the toxic and sometimes lethal substances in the EUA COVID-19 Vaccines.
My hope is that individuals, such as yourself, will stop misleading the American people with false information and lies, and begin to print and communicate the truth immediately. If you choose to continue to lie, you will continue to violate many U.S. Federal Laws that Protect Human Life and the Laws that Protect the Rights of Global Citizens. Without redemption and a change in course, you may be criminally charged, prosecuted, and held accountable.
May you reconcile your past actions with the truth, course correct your errors, and find peace within your soul.
God Bless America and those that Fight for Liberty, Freedom, Justice, and Truth.
Sincerely,
Karen Kingston
FYI - In regards to my experience within the Pharma industry and specifically to Pfizer, it’s false and incorrect to refer to me as whistleblower. A whistleblower is someone who releases confidential information that they were able to obtain under an NDA as an employee or as a contractor. All the information I have released and or spoken about is from publicly available sources, mostly from our own US government’s websites.
REUTERS AUGUST 6, 2021, REQUEST FOR RESPONSE.
From: Karen Kingston <k*****@varitage.com>
Date: Friday, August 6, 2021 at 4:52 PM
To: Karen Kingston <k*********@mifight.com>
Subject: Fwd: Reuters - media inquirySent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: reutersfactcheckthomsonreuters.com@thomsonreuters.com
Date: August 6, 2021 at 1:00:57 PM PDT
To: k*********@varitage.com
Cc: reutersfactcheckthomsonreuters.com@thomsonreuters.com
Subject: Reuters - media inquiryHello,
I am contacting you from Reuters Fact Check team, where we spot and debunk misinformation on social media.
We have come across a video in which you claim to present evidence that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines contain graphene oxide in its lipid nanoparticles.
We have contacted Sinopeg, which you point out to during the interview, who told us that have never provided any lipid nanoparticles that include graphene oxide. We also found that the article on their website about PEG/graphene oxide, was referring to a 2019 study, unrelated to COVID-19.
Experts also told us this material is not in the vaccines and that the PEG-lipid nanoparticles are there to give more stability to the mRNA.
We are writing an article to clarify the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines do not contain graphene oxide on its lipid nanoparticles or elsewhere.
We wanted to contact you in case you want to provide any comment on the matter or share further evidence? Are you able to verify your past employment relationship to Pfizer? We see that you were a sales representative and later worked in marketing, according to your website.
We are planning to publish on Monday.
Regards,
Reuters Fact Check
Read about Reuters Fact Check here:
www.reuters.com/fact-check/about
Thomson Reuters
This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended recipient and contains information that may be privileged and/or confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this e-mail and any attachments. Certain required legal entity disclosures can be accessed on our website: https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en/resources/disclosures.html
Poornima Wagh PhD and her team also said they found: reduced graphine oxide and also a lot of heavy metals in the injections not only from the US but also other countries.
ThomsonReuters is self-evidently an active participant in the propaganda psy-op machine so unless they are somehow judicially compelled (highly unlikely LOL) to recant their assertions they will never, as in NOT EVER, do so. That's OK though, they have less than zero credibility in any regard or matter going forward so their lack of willingness to level up only serves to further underscore their utter uselessness as a purveyor of legitimate information. They, along with the vast majority of the MSM, are done...