California Supreme Court Rules that San Diego School Board was Operating Under Delusional Authority when Mandating COVID-19 Vaccines

If charged and found guilty of inflicting harm or injury of a student due to the mandate, school board members may be sentenced to life in prison or the death penalty under 18 USC 242 and 18 USC 175.

February 25, 2023: On February 23, 2023, the California Supreme Court put the final nail in the coffin of the San Diego Unified School District’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for students 16 years of age and older. The California Supreme Court agreed with the plaintiffs, Let Them Breath (a San Diego based organization) that the school district board lacked the authority to impose vaccine mandates.

Under federal law 18 USC 242, the members of the San Diego Unified School District Board (Richard Barrera, Sabrina Bazzo, Kevin Beiser, Michael McQuary, and Sharon Whitehurst-Payne) who originally passed the COVID-19 vaccine school mandate were depriving students of their right to an in-person education under the pretense of authority that they did not have (aka, the color of law).

If parents had their children injected with the harmful COVID-19 biological agents because of the announced mandate and the mRNA injection resulted in the injury of their child, parents can criminally charge the members of the San Diego School Board under 18 USC 242 (Deprivation of Rights Under the Color of Law) and 18 USC 175 (Prohibition of the Use of Bioweapons). If students’ ‘vaccine’ injuries are prosecuted under these laws, board members and their expert panel can serve up to 10 years in prison.

The School Board was fully aware that the COVID-19 injections were experimental biological agents that cause disease, disabilities and death, and moved forward with passing the student COVID-19 vaccine mandate anyway.

On September 28, 2021, I sent a warning letter to the San Diego School Board and Expert Panel warning them that the COVID-19 injections were proven to cause PERMANENT INJURY, AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES, DISABILITIES, and DEATHS in children, teenagers, young adults, adults, and the elderly. The long-term risks and mortality are still unknown as the product has not even completed the short-term safety studies of 2-5 years.

I pointed out that the EXPERT PANEL member, Dr. Robert Chip Schooley, even confessed that the purpose of the San Diego School District mandate was not for the health benefit of students, but politically motivated to ‘mainstream’ mandating COVID-19 vaccines for all schools across America.

Thank goodness the California Supreme court did not support Dr. Schooley’s delusional and perverted vision to mandate that all children in San Diego be injected with these harmful biological agents in order to have the right to attend public school, and then eventually all children across America.

I clearly articulated in my letter to the school board that the COVID-19 injections do not prevent infection or disease, but rather cause injury, disease, disabilities and death. A biological agent that does not prevent infection or protect against disease, and was made available through deceptive experimentation on a civilian population is by definition, a bioweapon.

If a student died as a result of the COVID-19 injection, school board members can be charged with 1st degree murder for mandating and making readily available the use of a bioweapon under 18 USC 242 and 18 USC 175. If found guilty, school board members may be sentenced to life in prison or the death penalty under these laws.

Below is an excerpt from the letter (e-mail) and you can read the full copy here.

The Kingston Report. TRUTH WINS.

I promise you and I promise my son, the SDUSD board will be hearing from me again soon.

Mathew 18:6

“If anyone causes one of these little ones—those who believe in me—to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.”

This WARNING is sent to the attention of “Richard Barrera, Sabrina Bazzo, Kevin Beiser, Michael McQuary, and Sharon Whitehurst-Payne,” who are hereafter referred to individually and collectively as the ‘SDUSD BOARD,’ and to, “Richard Garfein, Kimberly Brouwer, Natasha Martin, Robert (Chip) Schooley, Davey Smith, Stephen Spector, and Mark Sawyer,” who are hereafter referred to individually and collectively as the ‘UCSD EXPERT PANEL’.

I believe one of the major contributing reasons why the SDUSD BOARD and EXPERT PANEL, as well as numerous other local and national organizations are under the illusion that they have the right to yield unbridled tyrannical authority in mandating unhealthy, damaging, and sometimes deadly mandates such as the COVID-19 VACCINE MANDATE FOR SAN DIEGO SCHOOLS, is because of the ‘immunity clause’ under the PREP ACT per the EUA.

COMIRNATY was unlawfully approved by the FDA and has proven to cause PERMANENT INJURY, AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES, DISABILITIES, and DEATHS in children, teenagers, young adults, adults, and the elderly. The long-term risks and mortality are still unknown as the product has not even completed the short-term safety studies of 2-5 years. This is just some of the young lives lost to the COVID-19 injections.

As the mother of a teenager and a 20+ year biotech/pharma/med-device marketer and analyst, I CONDEMN the COVID-19 VACCINE MANDATE FOR SAN DIEGO SCHOOLS.

I have cc’d numerous media outlets, welcoming the SDUSD BOARD and EXPERT PANEL to discuss their decision in the court of public opinion.

Sincerely,

Karen Kingston

San Diego Resident